May 2 2012
Paint Tool Sai + GIMP 

Paint Tool Sai + GIMP
 

Jan 31 2012
 Puke rainbows.Abbie Santillan (c) 2012 

 Puke rainbows.
Abbie Santillan (c) 2012 

Jan 26 2012

Boy and Girl
Because today is THURSDAY

:))

Abbie Santillan (c) 2012

Jan 25 2012
Happy Birthday to my HS teacher! :) Spread the loveeee. <3

Happy Birthday to my HS teacher! :) Spread the loveeee. <3

Jan 24 2012
Happy birthday to my super girlfriend, Elena. :)

Happy birthday to my super girlfriend, Elena. :)

Jan 22 2012
Rosalind Franklin (digitally painted + colored)REF PHOTO: Rosalind FranklinVictim of sexism&#8220;&#8230;but it is her role in the discovery of DNA structure that has garnered the most public attention. Crick, Watson, and Wilkins shared the 1962 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine for their work on the structure of DNA. None gave Franklin credit for her contributions at that time. Franklin&#8217;s work on DNA may have remained a quiet footnote in that story had Watson not caricatured her in his 1968 memoir, The Double Helix. There he presented Franklin as &#8220;Rosy,&#8221; a bad-tempered, arrogant bluestocking who jealously guarded her data from colleagues, even though she was not competent to interpret it. His book proved very popular, even though many of those featured in the story&#8212;including Crick, Wilkins, and Linus Pauling&#8212;protested Watson&#8217;s treatment of Franklin, as did many reviewers. In 1975, Franklin&#8217;s friend Anne Sayre published a biography in angry rebuttal to Watson&#8217;s account, and Franklin&#8217;s role in the discovery became better known. Numerous articles and several documentaries have attempted to highlight her part in &#8220;the race for the double helix,&#8221; often casting her as a feminist martyr, cheated of a Nobel prize both by misogynist colleagues and by her early death.&#8221;Source: NLM.NIH.GOV

Rosalind Franklin (digitally painted + colored)

REF PHOTO: Rosalind Franklin

Victim of sexism

“…but it is her role in the discovery of DNA structure that has garnered the most public attention. Crick, Watson, and Wilkins shared the 1962 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine for their work on the structure of DNA. None gave Franklin credit for her contributions at that time. Franklin’s work on DNA may have remained a quiet footnote in that story had Watson not caricatured her in his 1968 memoir, The Double Helix. There he presented Franklin as “Rosy,” a bad-tempered, arrogant bluestocking who jealously guarded her data from colleagues, even though she was not competent to interpret it. His book proved very popular, even though many of those featured in the story—including Crick, Wilkins, and Linus Pauling—protested Watson’s treatment of Franklin, as did many reviewers. In 1975, Franklin’s friend Anne Sayre published a biography in angry rebuttal to Watson’s account, and Franklin’s role in the discovery became better known. Numerous articles and several documentaries have attempted to highlight her part in “the race for the double helix,” often casting her as a feminist martyr, cheated of a Nobel prize both by misogynist colleagues and by her early death.”

Source: NLM.NIH.GOV